Most Viewed Stories
Most Commented Stories
Save & Share this Article
No charges for Swanson, Postmus, Almond from CCA grand jury
(Updated Friday, September 7, 2007, 10:36 a.m.)
After two years and five months, Eric Swanson, Bill Postmus and JoAnn Almond no longer appear to have anything to worry about regarding the California Charter Academy investigation.
At the Tuesday afternoon announcement of indictments against CCA founder C. Steven Cox and Hesperia City Councilman Tad Honeycutt, San Bernardino County District Attorney notably did not announce indictments against three other High Desert officials originally called out in the April 2005 audit report commissioned by the California Department of Education.
Former Hesperia Unified School District school board president Swanson, County Assessor Postmus and Victorville City Councilwoman Almond were each witnesses for a special grand jury impaneled in August to hear evidence in the CCA case. All three had served on the boards of various CCA schools at some point in the chain's five-year existence.
"I never expected any" criminal charges, Swanson said Thursday. "It never crossed my mind."
In the audit, Swanson's company, Community Information Services Online, was called out after the company was allegedly asked to provide computers and Internet services for CCA schools the same day Swanson had resigned from their governing boards. Swanson disputes the audit's version of events, saying his company never received any purchase order, and did not hear about the board's decision until later.
"When California Charter Academy started, I saw it as a very positive way to help students achieve where maybe they couldn't in an environment they were in before," Swanson said. "I was very sad to see that the original dream turned out this way. When I sat on the board, the goal was to give students more educational choices."
"There's nothing improper about taking a campaign contribution, so long as you follow the appropriate laws, which is what I've done, since day one. And that's obviously why I was cleared in this investigation," Postmus said Wednesday.
While serving on the boards of two CCA schools, then 1st District County Supervisor Postmus accepted $25,450 in campaign contributions from Cox and the Educational Administrative Services Corporation (EASC), a for-profit CCA subsidiary that provided administrative services to CCA schools.
"This was seven years ago. This was like their first year of existence," Postmus said. "Guilty of taking a campaign contribution? I did take a campaign contribution, as did a number of other elected officials in the High Desert area, and there was nothing inappropriate about it."
Despite saying there was nothing improper in originally taking the donation, Postmus said he would get rid of the funds if a jury ruled against Honeycutt and Cox.
"Although I've not yet read the indictments against Tad and Steven, if there are successful prosecutions made in this particular case, I will definitely donate campaign contributions I received from CCA or its affiliates to a charity within the county," Postmus said.
But he would make no predictions on the eventual jury verdict.
"I think we need to let the process play out and run its proper course and let justice prevail," Postmus said. "I'm just glad that this chapter is closed and I look forward to this whole issue playing out in the court of justice."
Almond could not be reached for comment.
Beau Yarbrough can be reached at 956-7108 or at beau@hesperiastar.com.
See archived 'Local News' Stories »
| Beverly, were you an OJ Simpson juror? |
|
| Henry Hesperia - Sep 10, 2007 11:45:44 AM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| anonymous, you did not answer the question. Your hostility is noted. Why the defensive response? See Beverly. I don't like your idea of justice. Too bad something like this has never happened to you. Maybe then you might understand. Presumed guilt, give me a break! |
|
| amicus curiae - Sep 09, 2007 10:02:20 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| Speaking of innocence and guilt, I may have missed the class in high school civics where we learned that indictment was a pronouncement of guilt. |
|
| Beverly - Sep 09, 2007 07:57:44 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| amicus,
you do not know who I am therefor you do not know what I know. So I can say what I feel regarding this situation. |
|
| anonymous - Sep 09, 2007 05:50:40 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| I also had my comments erased. Mark, etc, You guys must be relavtives of Mr. Cox and Honeycutt. Sorry you got your Cadillac taken away and lost your 100K salary.
These guys are as guilty as OJ Simpson. All that is missing is the video tape. There is well documented evidence that these thieves took TAXPAYER money and spent 25K at Guitar Center,etc. Sorry Mark, but I dont think any amount of posting will convince the jury that these JOs are not crooks. I hope you visit them in state prison in the next 60 years. |
|
| Henry Hesperia - Sep 08, 2007 04:03:44 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| anonymous, if you were not on the grand jury investigating this matter, what do you know that they, the members, should consider. If you have something, why don't you present it to the DA. If you don't have anything, consider an investigation of yourself over the past 20 years. Are you clean? Take comfort in the fact that we don't have a "police state" yet. |
|
| amicus curiae - Sep 08, 2007 02:31:02 PM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| How funny that one of my comments got deleted? they must of had their friends delete them. They all deserved charges as well. They know what they did. If I see any of the names the next elections I will tell others not to vote for them.
I think that they are sneaks and their friendships to others are fake |
|
| anonymous - Sep 08, 2007 09:22:00 AM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| This is really great news. Now,these nice people can go about their lives without worrying. |
|
| Mrs. Itsa Bout Time - Sep 07, 2007 10:27:21 AM | Remove Comment |
| | |
| Beau, your headline seems to suggest they've done something wrong. It is my opinion that people who are called to be witnesses are just that, not hidden criminals. Let's not paint the innocent with the whitewash of the guilty. You make it seems as though they should have been indicted, and that's not fair journalism. Rewrite this, espciallay the headline. |
|
| Mark - Sep 07, 2007 07:06:39 AM | Remove Comment |







