Welcome
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

District may lay off 54 teachers

School district faces estimated $5.5 million shortfall next school year

Staff Writer

The state of California's budget crisis may mean up to 54 fewer teachers working in the Hesperia Unified School District next year.

California is facing an estimated $14.5 billion difference between tax revenue and legally required spending. And part of that spending is the Average Daily Attendance payments made by the state to public school districts based on student attendance.

"Basically, we get like $6,000 per student, and the governor says 'I can't afford that, I'll pay you $5,500 per student,'" said George Landon, Assistant Superintendent of Business Services for the Hesperia Unified School District.

The state's ADA payments make up 73 percent of the HUSD's general operation fund -- as opposed to funds that can only be spent on expenses like facilities. The 7 percent cut currently being discussed in Sacramento would mean a $5.5 million budget shortfall in Fiscal Year 2008-2009. Salaries and benefits make up 76 percent of the HUSD's budget.

At Monday night's school board meeting, the board voted on resolutions that would cut 54 teachers from schools in the 2008-2009 school year, reduce the hours of principals, counselors, psychologists and others, and set down the criteria for choosing who will be cut and who will stay.

"I know this is a very difficult issue that we're all facing," board member Bruce Minton said. "Without exaggeration, I did not sleep Thursday night," after he first saw the proposed cuts.

The cuts include 40 elementary school teaching positions, 10 middle school teaching positions and 4 high school teaching positions. Among those laid off would be 4 elementary school music teachers and the district's high school piano teacher. Of the 40 elementary school teacher layoffs, 24 of them would be kindergarten teachers.

"I believe all of these 54 people, within the next year or two, we'll need," Minton said. "And if I were them, I wouldn't wait around for two years."

Those laid off will be chosen by a 12-point set of criteria, comparing teachers' credentials, teaching experience, educational levels and special training, work in the district outside of standard classroom duties, previous performance evaluations and even the number of days absent over the last three years.

Teachers may not be the only ones being laid off, if the worst case budget scenario comes to pass, but non-teaching staff only have to be given a 45 day notice before layoffs begin, by law.

Statewide, as many as 107,000 teachers may lose their jobs, along with 137,000 non-teaching school staffers, according to board member Lee Rogers. Any cuts will depend on the final budget approved by the state legislature, which is unlikely to pass a budget before summer and may not pass one until much later.

The school board unanimously accepted the resolutions outlining the layoffs, service reductions and criteria for workforce reductions.

"This was thrust upon us by the state of California," said board president and retired teacher Robert Kirk. "This is a horrific thing."

The next regular meeting of the HUSD school board will take place on April 7 at 6 p.m. at 15576 Main Street.

Beau Yarbrough can be reached at 956-7108 or at beau@hesperiastar.com.


See archived 'Local News' Stories »
 

Click to vote
Recommend this story?
Yes
No
The online vote: 16 2


Reader's comments




I guess now that the budget is not going to be cut and infact it will be increased will stop the insane cuts the district proposed. We shall see.

notinamillion years - May 14, 2008 07:06:57 PM Remove Comment

 
LBO, I think it would be good to spread around a pay cut to all. It bothers me though that the senority issue in the TA or any union is attacked. Yes, unfortunatly senority protects a few knuckleheads, but it also protects the good employees. If management was the sole decider of who stays or goes I can bet that wouldn't go over either.

voter - Mar 13, 2008 06:48:02 PM Remove Comment

 
Anger should be directed at state officials and elected persons, but they are not connectd to our local situation. The local school union is broken, in this case down the middle. Did that cause our current situation? No. But the union will have an effect on how we are able to answer the deficit.

LBO - Mar 13, 2008 06:28:03 PM Remove Comment

 
Maybe I should reword my previous post. What I was trying to say is that I believe the anger over the budget crises is misdirected. Instead of blaming the unions we should be blaming the leaders of the state and country.

voter - Mar 13, 2008 06:19:16 PM Remove Comment

 
Blaming the unions may make you feel better but I think the frustration and anger we are all feeling over this budget crises should be taken out the leaders of this state and country.

voter - Mar 13, 2008 06:13:31 PM Remove Comment

 
The story indicated that more than just seniority was being considered. As in the past, pink slips are given to indicate the possibilty of layoff NOT the inevitability. I really hope we are able to keep our HUSD staff by spreading the cuts to as many areas as possible.

LBO - Mar 13, 2008 03:07:09 PM Remove Comment

 
Ticked off, then someone needs to get rid of the union. If you want teachers being laid off based on performance, then the union needs to go. The union protects loyal members before it protects better performers.

Union Protection - Mar 13, 2008 09:37:56 AM Remove Comment

 
This is complete b. s. My kid's teacher was given the pink slip yesterday, so unfair! This teacher is wonderful, one of those diamond in the rough types. Unfortunately, because of seniority, this teacher will be the first to go. How is that fair? I know of several untenured teachers that do not deserve to be in a classroom, but since they've been around several months longer, they're safe. Someone needs to look at the pecking order here. Screw seniority, it should be based on performance. Someone needs to grow a pair and stick up for these poor teachers that have no control of their fate!

ticked off - Mar 13, 2008 07:51:01 AM Remove Comment

 
What is JD saying? It is a confusing comment. If the statement means that the last time we were facing a budget crisis and ALL teachers were given a RIF notice the union fought it and no one was laid off that is true. This time the union has pledged to work with the district to implement savings so that the layoffs will be minimal. No one will know the outcome of this until sometime in June. Give it a chance.

geez - Mar 12, 2008 06:59:27 PM Remove Comment

 
I agree LBO and that is exactly what happened last time there was a budget crunch. Most teachers were willing to give up a day to secure teacher jobs, administrators gave up days, and classified did as well. The union did not let it happen. Tigers may eat their young.

JD - Mar 12, 2008 06:12:26 PM Remove Comment

 
What makes I DON'T THINK SO think his or her job is safe? My point is this, if EVERYONE cuts back a little nobody will have to face the reality that they are newly unemployed. For every dollar you see in gross salary there is additional cost behind the scenes. So a net savings of $15 per person per day might only reduce the take home pay of the employee by less than $1 per hour. Of coarse some positions can afford more of a cut and some less. But don't worry, the union won't let teachers share the burden, they'll force layoffs.

LBO - Mar 12, 2008 01:43:50 PM Remove Comment

 
15 dollars a day is 300 dollars a month. You take the cut, LBO. Tell me how it works out. Cuts need not to involve people. Why should I share the pain in this district when this is the state's fault? I'm already going to be sharing the pain when they raise my taxes.

I Don\'t Think So - Mar 12, 2008 12:24:09 PM Remove Comment

 
Well, seeing as Mark has had the super job for 2 days, I'm sure the personnel assistant superintendent position has yet to be filled. Sam is right, too many chiefs. . . Oh, and GET OFF THE INTERNET AND GO BACK TO WORK! I think I heard your bell ring.

ms adler - Mar 12, 2008 11:23:00 AM Remove Comment

 
Yes, please go on. And while you're at it, can you tell me who is the current Assistant Superintendent of Personnel? I'm curious. Good luck with that.

To Sam - Mar 12, 2008 09:28:33 AM Remove Comment

 
The point with the $15 per day per person is to show how small an amount the budget needs to be cut. $15 per day for an average contract of 180 days IS alot of money for an individual earning a lower range salary, but if everyone takes a small hit AND other small measures are taken the shortfall disappears. Someone accused Jim of preparing to throw new teachers under the bus but i think everyone is looking over at there coworker and saying to themselves, hey I'm more important than they are, as long as I don't lose my job I'm happy.

LBO - Mar 12, 2008 08:39:27 AM Remove Comment

 
Well LBO, the chain is only as strong as our weakest link. Do you really think that we will not have immigrants if they don't get to go to school? We already have gang problems, now you will put more youngsters on the street and not address the illnesses of people in our communities who will spread their sickness to the rest of us. Immigration will continue as long as people continue to hire their labor. Do you want to get less than minimum wage to pick strawberries my friend?

JD - Mar 12, 2008 07:01:18 AM Remove Comment

 
Oh, LBO, coffee in break rooms comes not from the general fund, nor does the district provide that to any of our schools. How can you even think to ask any of us teachers to give up 15 dollars a day? That's 75 dollars a week. Are you willing to give that up? I agree with whoever wrote about transportation. Enlarge the busing boundaries, and you can save a lot.

Give me a Break - Mar 11, 2008 06:03:01 PM Remove Comment

 
If you want my oppinion, and i fear none do, the budget short fall should be shared by all. If every employee gave up the equivilent of $15 per day the problem could be solved. Some salaries are larger than others and could absorb more but you get the idea. And not all of the $15 needs to come from take home salary it can come from benefits, payroll taxes, free coffee in the breakroom etc.

LBO - Mar 11, 2008 04:58:47 PM Remove Comment

 
The prisons, schools and hospitals are over run by those who do not pay taxes yet consume resources. They are stealing services paid for by the tax payers FOR the tax payers. All i can say is I would be REALLY mad if I or someone I know looses thier job because people are stealing services. I remember voting for prop 187 and how shocked I was when the popular vote supported the idea and the politicians told us to pound sand. Unfortunatly, the state sends us money for those kids too and if the kids of non tax payers stopped coming to our schools we would loose much needed revenue, so there is an incentive to allow them to attend.

LBO - Mar 11, 2008 04:48:11 PM Remove Comment

 
pardon the run ons, but I pressed ENTER after each of those titles, oh well. You get the drift.

sam - Mar 11, 2008 04:36:27 PM Remove Comment

 



Add your comments
Please follow and enforce these guidelines:
1. No flaming. Do not be hostile.
2. No comments that are obscene, vulgar, lewd, sexually-oriented, threatening, libelous, or illegal.
3. No racial slurs or insults.
4. "Remove Comment" flags offensive comment for removal.

Verification Code:
Enter Verification:
Your Name:
Your Comment:
By submitting this form, you agree to this site's terms of service




Jobs
Autos
Real Estate
Classifieds
Today's Ads
Search for Jobs - Monster.com
   
ADVERTISEMENT 
Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
  • 5 Day Event Calendar
Fri16
Sat17
Sun18
Mon19
Tue20
Poll
Economic stimulus?
What will you be doing with the federal economic stimulus payments being sent out this month?
Save it! (Or pay off credit cards or other debts.)
Spend it!
I don't know!
Enter The Code To Vote
 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site